Personal Reflection paper on critical thinking
Personal Reflection paper on critical thinking
I need a 5-7 page paper written on critical thinking. Here is the scoring guide for it.
Identify the critical success factors in drawing valid conclusions with a supporting example. 25% | Does not list critical success factors in drawing valid conclusions. Omits many critical success factors and provides no examples. | Lists some critical success factors in drawing valid conclusions but provides no examples. | Identifies the critical success factors in drawing valid conclusions, each with a supporting example. | Identifies all of the critical success factors in drawing valid conclusions with many effective examples from personal and professional life. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Identify the critical success factors using clear unambiguous language with a supporting example. 25% | Does not list critical success factors using clear unambiguous language and provides no examples. | Lists some critical success factors using clear unambiguous language and provides no examples. | Identifies the critical success factors using clear unambiguous language with a supporting example. | Identifies all of the critical success factors using clear unambiguous language with many effective examples from personal and professional life. |
Identify the critical success factors in distinguishing deduction from induction with a supporting example. 25% | Does not list critical success factors in distinguishing deduction from induction and provides no examples. | List some critical success factors in distinguishing deduction from induction but provides no examples. | Identifies the critical success factors in distinguishing deduction from induction, each with a supporting example. | Identifies all of the critical success factors in distinguishing deduction from induction with many effective examples from personal and professional life. |
Write coherently to support a central idea in appropriate format with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics. 25% | Writing does not support a central idea in appropriate format. Does not use correct grammar, usage, and mechanics. | Writing supports an idea. Format is inconsistent, contains major errors of grammar, usage, and mechanics. | Writing clearly supports a central idea in appropriate format and with few errors of grammar, usage, and mechanics. | Writing is coherent, using evidence to support a central idea in a consistently appropriate format with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics. |
Also attached is a outline for the paper to try to help.
PHI 2100 U03a1 – Williamson.docx